Name:
(as it would appear on official course roster)
Umail address:	@umail.ucsb.edu	section 4pm, 5pm, 6pm
Optional: name you wish to be called if different from name above.
Optional: name of "homework buddy" (leaving this blank signifies "I worked alone"

eval01: Evaluation of day 1 presentations

ready?	assigned	due	points
true	Wed 03/06 02:00PM	Wed 03/06 03:15PM

Please evaluate today’s speakers using the following rubric. Please rate your own presentation as well; simply mark the box that says: “This is my own group’s presentation”. This should be filled out in class and turned in on Wed, Mar 06, 2019

Poor		Acceptable		Excellent
1	2	3	4	5
The project was poorly presented. Supporting details and components are absent or vague. The main theme and supporting details are presented in a disorganized, unrelated way.		The project was clearly presented with most supporting details; generally meets requirements of assignment		The project was well presented; effectively described all components requested for the assignment. Each segment relates to the others according to a carefully planned framework.

Feedback on first talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )

(5 pts) Team name:

	Poor		Acceptable		Excellent
(5 pts) Rating:	☐ 1	☐ 2	☐ 3	☐ 4	☐ 5

(5 pts) Did well:

(5 pts) Could improve:

Feedback on second talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )

(5 pts) Team name:

	Poor		Acceptable		Excellent
(5 pts) Rating:	☐ 1	☐ 2	☐ 3	☐ 4	☐ 5

(5 pts) Did well:

(5 pts) Could improve:

Poor		Acceptable		Excellent
1	2	3	4	5
The project was poorly presented. Supporting details and components are absent or vague. The main theme and supporting details are presented in a disorganized, unrelated way.		The project was clearly presented with most supporting details; generally meets requirements of assignment		The project was well presented; effectively described all components requested for the assignment. Each segment relates to the others according to a carefully planned framework.

Feedback on third talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )

(5 pts) Team name:

	Poor		Acceptable		Excellent
(5 pts) Rating:	☐ 1	☐ 2	☐ 3	☐ 4	☐ 5

(5 pts) Did well:

(5 pts) Could improve:

Feedback on fourth talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )

(5 pts) Team name:

	Poor		Acceptable		Excellent
(5 pts) Rating:	☐ 1	☐ 2	☐ 3	☐ 4	☐ 5

(5 pts) Did well:

(5 pts) Could improve:

Feedback on fifth talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )

(5 pts) Team name:

	Poor		Acceptable		Excellent
(5 pts) Rating:	☐ 1	☐ 2	☐ 3	☐ 4	☐ 5

(5 pts) Did well:

(5 pts) Could improve: