1
eval02
CS48 W19
Name:
(as it would appear on official course roster)
Umail address: @umail.ucsb.edu section
4pm, 5pm, 6pm
Optional: name you wish to be called
if different from name above.
Optional: name of "homework buddy"
(leaving this blank signifies "I worked alone"

eval02: Evaluation of day 2 presentations

ready? assigned due points
true Mon 03/11 02:00PM Mon 03/11 03:15PM
https://ucsb-cs48.github.io/w19/hwk/eval02/

Please evaluate today’s speakers using the following rubric. Please rate your own presentation as well; simply mark the box that says: “This is my own group’s presentation”. This should be filled out in class and turned in on Mon, Mar 11, 2019

Poor   Acceptable   Excellent
1 2 3 4 5
The project was poorly presented. Supporting details and components are absent or vague. The main theme and supporting details are presented in a disorganized, unrelated way.   The project was clearly presented with most supporting details; generally meets requirements of assignment   The project was well presented; effectively described all components requested for the assignment. Each segment relates to the others according to a carefully planned framework.
  1. Feedback on first talk ( please check this box if this is your team )

    (5 pts) Team name:

      Poor   Acceptable   Excellent
    (5 pts) Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

    (5 pts) Did well:

    (5 pts) Could improve:

  2. Feedback on second talk ( please check this box if this is your team )

    (5 pts) Team name:

      Poor   Acceptable   Excellent
    (5 pts) Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

    (5 pts) Did well:

    (5 pts) Could improve:

    Poor   Acceptable   Excellent
    1 2 3 4 5
    The project was poorly presented. Supporting details and components are absent or vague. The main theme and supporting details are presented in a disorganized, unrelated way.   The project was clearly presented with most supporting details; generally meets requirements of assignment   The project was well presented; effectively described all components requested for the assignment. Each segment relates to the others according to a carefully planned framework.
  3. Feedback on third talk ( please check this box if this is your team )

    (5 pts) Team name:

      Poor   Acceptable   Excellent
    (5 pts) Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

    (5 pts) Did well:

    (5 pts) Could improve:

  4. Feedback on fourth talk ( please check this box if this is your team )

    (5 pts) Team name:

      Poor   Acceptable   Excellent
    (5 pts) Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

    (5 pts) Did well:

    (5 pts) Could improve:

  5. Feedback on fifth talk ( please check this box if this is your team )

    (5 pts) Team name:

      Poor   Acceptable   Excellent
    (5 pts) Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

    (5 pts) Did well:

    (5 pts) Could improve: