1 |
eval03 |
CS48 W19 |
Name: | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
(as it would appear on official course roster) | ||||
Umail address: | @umail.ucsb.edu | section 4pm, 5pm, 6pm |
||
Optional: name you wish to be called if different from name above. | ||||
Optional: name of "homework buddy" (leaving this blank signifies "I worked alone" |
eval03: Evaluation of day 3 presentations
ready? | assigned | due | points |
---|---|---|---|
true | Wed 03/13 02:00PM | Wed 03/13 03:15PM |
Please evaluate today’s speakers using the following rubric. Please rate your own presentation as well; simply mark the box that says: “This is my own group’s presentation”. This should be filled out in class and turned in on Wed, Mar 13, 2019
Poor | Acceptable | Excellent | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
The project was poorly presented. Supporting details and components are absent or vague. The main theme and supporting details are presented in a disorganized, unrelated way. | The project was clearly presented with most supporting details; generally meets requirements of assignment | The project was well presented; effectively described all components requested for the assignment. Each segment relates to the others according to a carefully planned framework. |
-
Feedback on first talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )
(5 pts) Team name:
Poor Acceptable Excellent (5 pts) Rating: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 (5 pts) Did well:
(5 pts) Could improve:
-
Feedback on second talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )
(5 pts) Team name:
Poor Acceptable Excellent (5 pts) Rating: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 (5 pts) Did well:
(5 pts) Could improve:
Poor Acceptable Excellent 1 2 3 4 5 The project was poorly presented. Supporting details and components are absent or vague. The main theme and supporting details are presented in a disorganized, unrelated way. The project was clearly presented with most supporting details; generally meets requirements of assignment The project was well presented; effectively described all components requested for the assignment. Each segment relates to the others according to a carefully planned framework. -
Feedback on third talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )
(5 pts) Team name:
Poor Acceptable Excellent (5 pts) Rating: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 (5 pts) Did well:
(5 pts) Could improve:
-
Feedback on fourth talk ( ☐ please check this box if this is your team )
(5 pts) Team name:
Poor Acceptable Excellent (5 pts) Rating: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 (5 pts) Did well:
(5 pts) Could improve: